Dietary polyunsaturated fat intake is associated with low-density lipoprotein size, but not with susceptibility to oxidation in subjects with impaired glucose metabolism and type II diabetes: the Hoorn study

OBJECTIVE: A high monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake is associated with lower plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. However, PUFA may increase the susceptibility of LDL to undergo oxidative modifications. The aim of this study was to analyze the association of habitual dietary fat intake with LDL size and oxidizability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Cohort study. SUBJECTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight subjects with normal, impaired glucose metabolism and type II diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Mean LDL size was measured by high-performance gel-filtration chromatography. In vitro oxidizability of LDL was determined by measuring lag time, reflecting the resistance of LDL to copper-induced oxidation. Information about dietary fat intake was obtained by a validated food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: PUFA intake (energy percent) was significantly and negatively associated with LDL size in subjects with type II diabetes (standardized beta (95% confidence interval) -0.17 (-0.28;-0.06)) and impaired glucose metabolism - although not statistically significant - (-0.09 (-0.24;0.05)), but not in subjects with normal glucose metabolism (0.01 (-0.10;0.12)) (P-value for interaction=0.02). No significant associations were observed for total, saturated fat and MUFA intake with LDL size. Intake of fat was associated with lag time; however, the small magnitude of the associations suggested that the composition of dietary fat is not a major factor affecting lag time. The same association with lag time was observed in all three glucose metabolism categories. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism, higher PUFA intake is associated with smaller LDL particle size, but does not alter the susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation. SPONSORSHIP: Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation, and the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)

A Phospholipidomic Analysis of All Defined Human Plasma Lipoproteins

Since plasma lipoproteins contain both protein and phospholipid components, either may be involved in processes such as atherosclerosis. In this study the identification of plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipids, which is essential for understanding these processes at the molecular level, are performed. LC-ESI/MS, LC-ESI-MS/MS and High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of different lipoprotein fractions collected from pooled plasma revealed the presence of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), and sphingomyeline (SM) only on lipoproteins and phosphatidylcholine (PC), Lyso-PC on both lipoproteins and plasma lipoprotein free fraction (PLFF). Cardiolipin, phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and Phosphatidylserine (PS) were observed neither in the lipoprotein fractions nor in PLFF. All three approaches led to the same results regarding phospholipids occurrence in plasma lipoproteins and PLFF. A high abundancy of PE and SM was observed in VLDL and LDL fractions respectively. This study provides for the first time the knowledge about the phospholipid composition of all defined plasma lipoproteins

Method-dependent increase in lipoprotein(a) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during pregnancy

The current prevalent view is that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are under strong genetic control. Most dietary and drug interventions seem to have little or no effect on plasma Lp(a) levels. However, evidence for a possible regulatory role of hormones is accumulating, for instance, fluctuations of Lp(a) levels during pregnancy have been reported. Also, in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients, elevated Lp(a) levels have been reported. In the present longitudinal study, plasma lipid concentrations, including Lp(a), were determined in IDDM women before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and 3 months postpartum. In our study population, Lp(a) concentration was not significantly correlated with either hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels or apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype. Changes in other lipid parameters observed during pregnancy in our IDDM population were similar to those reported during normal pregnancy. Lp(a) concentrations were quantified using two different immunochemical methods that possess different sensitivities and specificities: an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) using two different anti-apo(a) antibodies, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an anti-apo(a) and an anti-apo B antibody. Median prepregnancy Lp(a) concentrations were 118 mg/L (range, 15 to 672) as determined with the IRMA and 107 mg/L (range, 21 to 451) as determined with the ELISA. Women with IDDM showed, in general, no significant change in Lp(a) concentration during pregnancy when it was assayed with the IRMA, although a tendency to increased values was observed. When Lp(a) concentrations were determined with the ELISA, a strong and significant increase in Lp(a) from weeks 17 to 24 of pregnancy onward was found. The latter results confirm the prevalent view that during pregnancy Lp(a) levels are increased. However, the present results and those of others on Lp(a) in normal pregnancy strongly emphasize the importance of method selection when determining Lp(a) concentrations. Copyright (C) 1995 by W.B. Saunders Compan